<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Citizens for Balanced Use &#187; Public Access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://balanceduse.org/news/public-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://balanceduse.org</link>
	<description>Support responsible shared use of YOUR public lands!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:31:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rocky Mtn. front proposed wilderness Listening session April 21 Sat</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/rocky-mtn-front-proposed-wilderness-listening-session-april-21-sat/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/rocky-mtn-front-proposed-wilderness-listening-session-april-21-sat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 04:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rehberg Schedules Rocky Mountain Front Listening Session in Choteau 04/13/12 BILLINGS – Montana’s Congressman, Denny Rehberg, today announced his intention to hold a public listening session to discuss the implications of the Rocky Mountain Front Heritage Act, introduced by Senator Max Baucus and cosponsored by Senator Jon Tester.  In 2010, Rehberg held similar public forums to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><h3>Rehberg Schedules Rocky Mountain Front Listening Session in Choteau</h3>
<p>04/13/12</p>
<div>
<p>BILLINGS – Montana’s Congressman, <strong>Denny Rehberg</strong>, today announced his intention to hold a public listening session to discuss the implications of the Rocky Mountain Front Heritage Act, introduced by Senator <strong>Max Baucus</strong> and cosponsored by Senator <strong>Jon Tester</strong>.  In 2010, Rehberg held similar public forums to discuss Senator Tester&#8217;s wilderness bill.</p>
<p>“Most of Senator Baucus’ wilderness bill support is coming from the same groups that support Senator Tester’s wilderness bill,” said Rehberg.  “When I held public meetings about Senator Tester’s bill, it quickly became obvious that it was a lot less popular than the manufactured support had led on.  From guarantees on grazing rights to restricted energy production, I’ve already heard some pretty major concerns about Sen. Baucus’ bill, and I intend to give all Montanans the voice they deserve in their government.”</p>
<p>Rehberg has hosted more than 100 public listening sessions across Montana since President Obama was sworn into office.  He was the only member of the Montana delegation to hold such meetings before the final passage of the President’s unpopular health care law.</p>
<p><strong>What</strong>: Rehberg Rocky Mountain Front Heritage Act Listening Session</p>
<p><strong>When</strong>: Saturday, April 21 at 2:30 PM</p>
<p><strong>Where</strong>: Choteau Country Club (1502 Airport Rd)</p>
<p><strong>Who</strong>: All members of the public and media</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/rocky-mtn-front-proposed-wilderness-listening-session-april-21-sat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wallowa Whitman forest travel withdrawn</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/wallowa-whitman-forest-travel-withdrawn/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/wallowa-whitman-forest-travel-withdrawn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 03:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CBU comment: This is a great victory for Forest Access for All and Multiple Use on public lands. Kerry White from CBU went down to Wallowa-Whitman forest in Oregon back some years ago and helped the folks down there with how to comment on the forest travel plan. Kerry was down for a week the beginning of April [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>CBU comment: This is a great victory for Forest Access for All and Multiple Use on public lands. Kerry White from CBU went down to Wallowa-Whitman forest in Oregon back some years ago and helped the folks down there with how to comment on the forest travel plan. Kerry was down for a week the beginning of April assisting FAFA in writing appeals in over a dozen meetings and presentations. CBU applauds the hard work and commitment of the newly formed group Forest Access For All and all the forest users who stepped up and fought these overbearing closures. This is a great example to others across the nation how multiple forest users can get together and make their voices heard. Continue to keep up the hard work!! &#8220;The price of freedom is constant vigilance&#8221; Thomas Jefferson</p>
<div></div>
<h1><a title="Wallowa-Whitman supervisor withdraws travel management plan; Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Supervisor Monica Schwalbach announced today that she is withdrawing her decision on the controversial travel management plan that would ban motor vehicles from about 3,600 miles of roads and trails on 1.3 million acres of the forest.      Schwalbach's ... (click to read full article)" href="http://www.bakercityherald.com/Local-News/Wallowa-Whitman-supervisor-withdraws-travel-management-plan">Wallowa-Whitman supervisor withdraws travel management plan</a></h1>
<div>April 17, 2012 03:31 pm</div>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" valign="top">Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Supervisor Monica Schwalbach announced today that she is withdrawing her decision on the controversial travel management plan that would ban motor vehicles from about 3,600 miles of roads and trails on 1.3 million acres of the forest.</p>
<p>Schwalbach&#8217;s announcement means the April 30 deadline to appeal the plan is no longer in effect.</p>
<p>In a letter announcing her decision, Schwalbach did not set a timeline for announcing a revised version of the plan.</p>
<p>&#8220;I believe that by taking the time now to allow for further dialogue and consideration regarding the concerns that have been raised; we will develop a better outcome in the long run,&#8221; Schwalbach wrote. &#8220;I encourage anyone who has additional suggestions to share them with me or one of our local district rangers. The Wallowa-Whitman national forest is treasured by all, so let’s be sure we develop a plan that is reasonable, responsible, and makes sense now and for the future.&#8221;</p>
<p>Schwalbach&#8217;s announcement of the travel plan on March 15 angered many local residents, who contend the ban on motor vehicles will greatly diminish their chances to use the Wallowa-Whitman for firewood cutting, berry picking, sightseeing and other recreation.</p>
<p>On Monday Rep. Greg Walden, who represents Eastern Oregon in Congress, wrote a letter to the Forest Service&#8217;s regional forester in Portland urging the agency to &#8220;start over&#8221; on the travel plan for the Wallowa-Whitman.</p>
<p>Check Wednesday&#8217;s Baker City Herald for full coverage of Schwalbach&#8217;s announcement as well as reaction to Walden&#8217;s efforts.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bakercityherald.com/Local-News/Wallowa-Whitman-supervisor-withdraws-travel-management-plan">http://www.bakercityherald.com/Local-News/Wallowa-Whitman-supervisor-withdraws-travel-management-plan</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/wallowa-whitman-forest-travel-withdrawn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBU in Oregon</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/cbu-oregon/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/cbu-oregon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CBU News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kerry White from CBU went out to Lagrande to help those folks on writing their Forest appeals Kerry White power point presentation video]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Kerry White from CBU went out to Lagrande to help those folks on writing their Forest appeals</p>
<p><a href="http://www.livestream.com/lagrandealive/video?clipId=pla_ceccd7df-0502-4867-aebf-d0d876990dd9&amp;utm_source=lslibrary&amp;utm_medium=ui-thumb">Kerry White power point presentation video</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/cbu-oregon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bear Canyon Road Issue</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/bear-canyon-road-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/bear-canyon-road-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gallatin County just sent a letter to the Forest Service announcing they will be taking them to federal court for the damage and trespass the FS did to Bear Canyon Road. The people are going to get Bear Canyon Road back. Bear Canyon Road was established in 1903 and predates the Forest Service To read [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Gallatin County just sent a letter to the Forest Service announcing they will be taking them to federal court for the damage and trespass the FS did to Bear Canyon Road. The people are going to get Bear Canyon Road back. Bear Canyon Road was established in 1903 and predates the Forest Service</p>
<p>To read the PDF copy of the Gallatin County commission letter click here <a href="http://balanceduse.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Bear-Canyon-FS-litigation-3-27-12.pdf">Bear Canyon FS litigation 3-27-12</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/bear-canyon-road-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rehbergs letter to the Forest Service</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/rehbergs-letter-forest-service/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/rehbergs-letter-forest-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[January 11, 2012 &#160; Mr. Tom Tidwell Chief, USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20250 &#160; Dear Mr. Tidwell: &#160; I&#8217;m writing on behalf of my constituents who have raised concerns regarding the Gallatin Forest Travel Plan.  As you know, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld a ruling that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>January 11, 2012</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Mr. Tom Tidwell</p>
<p>Chief, USDA Forest Service</p>
<p>1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.</p>
<p>Washington, D.C. 20250</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Dear Mr. Tidwell:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m writing on behalf of my constituents who have raised concerns regarding the Gallatin Forest Travel Plan.  As you know, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld a ruling that the Forest Service&#8217;s Gallatin National Forest Travel Plan did not comply with the Montana Wilderness Study Act of 1977.  It was the court&#8217;s opinion that the plan &#8220;improperly ignores the impact of increased volume of motorized and mechanized use on current users&#8217; ability to seek quiet and solitude in the study area.&#8221;  When defending its decision to not include historical use data, the Forest Service claimed that it was a non factor because there wasn&#8217;t any historical use data available.</p>
<p>It is my understanding that during the comment period for the travel plan a substantial amount of historic use evidence including signed letters, pictures, a log sheet created by a FS employee, and an advertisement from the Forest Service to encourage people to come to the WSA to snowmobile.  For whatever reason it appears that none of this important evidence was used by your agency during the Draft Environmental Impact Statement.  Unfortunately, the courts have used this lack of evidence as their reasoning to uphold their latest ruling.</p>
<p>Since the travel plan has been held up by the courts, the Gallatin Forest has had to revert back to a backup winter use plan that is extremely restrictive to snowmobile use.  Meanwhile, the local economies around the forest are suffering due to the restrictions. Snowmobiles in the Gallatin National Forest alone bring in over 20 million dollars of economic activity every winter. This money turns over 13 times throughout this area in support of all the businesses. This activity and the money it generates are critical to the economic health of our area.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I urge you to draft another Travel Plan that includes all historical use data that is submitted during the comment period. We need a solution that works for the folks who live and work in and around the Gallatin National Forest.  Thank you for your consideration of this request, and please don&#8217;t hesitate to contact my office if I can be of further assistance.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Denny Rehberg</p>
<p>Member of Congress</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/rehbergs-letter-forest-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kootenai forest DEIS Land management comments due April 5</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/kootenai-forest/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/kootenai-forest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Forest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kootenai National Forest DEIS  The Kootenai National Forest released the DEIS and Draft Revised Land Management Plan on January 6, 2012. This starts the 90 day comment period. All comments on this action will be due on April 5th, 2012.Copies of the DEIS and associated information on this action can be found at: http://www.fs.fed.us/kipz It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table id="yiv460129315content_LETTER.BLOCK6" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#3e506d">
<h3>Kootenai National Forest DEIS </h3>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">The Kootenai National Forest released the DEIS and Draft Revised Land Management Plan on January 6, 2012. This starts the 90 day comment period. All comments on this action will be due on April 5th, 2012.Copies of the DEIS and associated information on this action can be found at:</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=j5rnoncab&amp;et=1109116304240&amp;s=695&amp;e=0017AuqJINg8BCr6DziHgotmI81kCtr9-d5eU9uTucyWjEupUgh3rTYyRYrQmhVFlxFgZ2k1IF_SG5SMCZ4OF7nWveydR_702F7mmts_hItu4UiN975eZpFlg==" target="_blank">http://www.fs.fed.us/kipz</a></p>
<p>It is important to comment on the DEIS in order to have standing to appeal any decision.</p>
<div>If the final decision is not satisfactory and legal action is necessary, all administrative remedies must be exhausted by an individual or organization to have standing in court.</div>
<p>Parties that <strong>do not</strong> comment on the DEIS have <strong>NO</strong> standing to appeal the decision.<br />
 <br />
Parties that <strong>do not</strong> have standing to appeal and therefore <strong>do not</strong> appeal a possible<br />
 bad agency decision<strong> do not</strong> have standing in any action to litigate the final Record of Decision.</p>
<div>People contact CBU all the time and ask</div>
<div><strong>What happened, how can they do this, what can I do to stop this?</strong></div>
<p>Our answer is simple</p>
<p><strong>Did you comment on the DEIS? Because if you didn&#8217;t there is nothing you can do NOW.</strong></p>
<div><strong>IT&#8217;S TOO LATE</strong> </div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/kootenai-forest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idaho Panhandle forest DEIS comments due by April 5th</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/idaho-panhandle-forest-deis-comments-due-april-5th/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/idaho-panhandle-forest-deis-comments-due-april-5th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Forest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Idaho Panhandle National Forest DEIS  The Idaho Panhandle National Forest released the DEIS and Draft Revised Land Management Plan on January 6, 2012. This starts the 90 day comment period. All comments on this action will be due on April 5th, 2012. Copies of the DEIS and associated information on this action can be found [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table id="yiv460129315content_LETTER.BLOCK5" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#3e506d">
<h3>Idaho Panhandle National Forest DEIS </h3>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">The Idaho Panhandle National Forest released the DEIS and Draft Revised Land Management Plan on January 6, 2012. This starts the 90 day comment period. All comments on this action will be <strong>due on April 5th, 2012.</strong></p>
<p>Copies of the DEIS and associated information on this action can be found at:</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=j5rnoncab&amp;et=1109116304240&amp;s=695&amp;e=0017AuqJINg8BCr6DziHgotmI81kCtr9-d5eU9uTucyWjEupUgh3rTYyRYrQmhVFlxFgZ2k1IF_SG5SMCZ4OF7nWveydR_702F7mmts_hItu4UiN975eZpFlg==" target="_blank">http://www.fs.fed.us/kipz</a></p>
<p>It is important to comment on the DEIS in order to have standing to appeal any decision.</p>
<div>If the final decision is not satisfactory and legal action is necessary, all administrative remedies must be exhausted by an individual or organization to have standing in court.</p>
<p>Parties that <strong>do not</strong> comment on the DEIS have <strong>NO</strong> standing to appeal the decision.<br />
 <br />
Parties that <strong>do not</strong> have standing to appeal and therefore do not appeal a possible<br />
 bad agency decision do not have standing in any action to litigate the decision.</p>
<p>People contact CBU all the time and ask</p>
<p>What happened, how can they do this, what can I do to stop this?</p>
<p>Our answer is simple</p>
<p>Did you comment on the DEIS? Because if you didn&#8217;t there is nothing you can do NOW.<strong></p>
<p></strong>IT&#8217;S TOO LATE </div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/idaho-panhandle-forest-deis-comments-due-april-5th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clearwater Forest ROD appeals due Feb 24th</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/clearwater-forest-rod-appeals-due-feb-24th/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/clearwater-forest-rod-appeals-due-feb-24th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clearwater National Forest Record of Decision  The Clearwater National Forest released their Record of Decision on January 10th, 2012. A written Notice of Appeal must be postmarked or received within 45 days following the publication date of this decision. Appeals due by February 24th, 2012. Paper Appeals must be submitted to: USDA Forest Service, Northern [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table id="yiv460129315content_LETTER.BLOCK4" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#3e506d">
<h3>Clearwater National Forest Record of Decision </h3>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">The Clearwater National Forest released their Record of Decision on January 10th, 2012. A written Notice of Appeal must be postmarked or received within 45 days following the publication date of this decision. Appeals due by February 24th, 2012.</p>
<p>Paper Appeals must be submitted to:</p>
<p>USDA Forest Service, Northern Region<br />
Federal Building, 200 Broadway<br />
ATTN: Appeal Deciding Officer<br />
P.O. Box 7669<br />
Missoula, MT 59807</p>
<p>In order for your appeal to be accepted, you must have commented on the DEIS.</p>
<p>Any club or organization may appeal this decision if one or more of their members commented on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement.</p>
<p>Of great concern to CBU is the fact the Clearwater in their decision has again decided to remove ALL motorized and mechanized use in agency Recommended Wilderness Areas. (RWAs)<br />
This action creates defacto wilderness by an agency acting outside their authority.</p>
<div><strong>Only Congress can designate wilderness.</strong></div>
<p>This will include all of the Great Burn Area and also Fish Lake Trail #419.</p>
<p>Removal of all motorized and mechanized use in RWAs is a clear violation of NEPA.<br />
The agency has never conducted a NEPA analysis of this action.</p>
<div><strong>CBU encourages all parties with standing to appeal this Record of Decision</strong>.</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/clearwater-forest-rod-appeals-due-feb-24th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bozeman Chronicle article on Gallatin Crest</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/bozeman-chronicle-article-gallatin-crest/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/bozeman-chronicle-article-gallatin-crest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 05:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The next steps for the Gallatin Crest Windy Pass in the Gallatin Range is a place of spectacular beauty. Trying to explain it, Roger Jenkins recently recalled the opening scene of “The Sound of Music,” when Julie Andrews twirls in a grassy mountain meadow singing “The Hills are Alive.” To read full story Click here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><h3 id="blox-asset-title">The next steps for the Gallatin Crest</h3>
<p>Windy Pass in the Gallatin Range is a place of spectacular beauty.</p>
<p>Trying to explain it, Roger Jenkins recently recalled the opening scene of “The Sound of Music,” when Julie Andrews twirls in a grassy mountain meadow singing “The Hills are Alive.”</p>
<p>To read full story<a href="http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/news/environment/article_a6f7708a-39b8-11e1-afa5-001871e3ce6c.html"> Click here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/bozeman-chronicle-article-gallatin-crest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sage Grouse meetings to attend</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/sage-grouse-meetings-attend/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/sage-grouse-meetings-attend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 04:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sage Grouse habitat is a tool used by federal land managers to restrict access for recreation, resource development, and ultimately the taking of private property rights. Land management agencies fueled by a takeover from well funded environmental groups are portraying these actions as partnerships and cooperative agreements when in fact these are planned and predetermined [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><em>Sage Grouse habitat is a tool used by federal land managers to restrict access for recreation, resource development, and ultimately the taking of private property rights. Land management agencies fueled by a takeover from well funded environmental groups are portraying these actions as partnerships and cooperative agreements when in fact these are planned and predetermined agendas focused on removing people from the land and their property.</em></p>
<p><em>Two such meetings in Lewistown and Dillon have been scheduled to present their plans.</p>
<div><strong>Please take the time to attend one or both of these meetings.</strong></div>
<p> </em></p>
<div><strong><a rel="nofollow"></p>
<p>BLM Schedules Greater Sage-Grouse Planning<br />
Strategy Scoping Meeting in Dillon</a> </strong></div>
<p>As part of a national strategy to evaluate greater sage-grouse conservation measures in land use plans, the Bureau of Land Management&#8217;s Dillon Field Office is asking the public to help identify issues to be addressed in an environmental impact statement and land use plan amendment.</p>
<p>A scoping open house will be held</p>
<p><strong>Jan. 12, 2012, at the National Guard Armory  </strong></p>
<p><strong>in Dillon from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. </strong> </p>
<p>Members of the public can drop into the open house at any time between those hours.  The armory is located at 1050 Montana Hwy. 41.</p>
<p>The Dillon meeting is one of 26 being held across the Western Region.  Scoping meetings allow attendees the opportunity to review posters and other informational materials, talk with project team members, and submit comments on the project.</p>
<p><strong>Bureau of Land Management Begins Scoping for Greater Sage-Grouse Planning Strategy</strong></p>
<p>As part of a national strategy to evaluate greater sage-grouse conservation measures in land use plans, the BLM Lewistown Field Office is asking the public to help identify issues to be addressed in an environmental impact statement and land use plan amendment. A scoping open house will be held <strong>January 10, 2012, at the Yogo Inn in Lewistown from 5 to 8 p.m</strong>. Members of the public can drop into the open house at any time between those hours. A short overview of the sage-grouse planning strategy will be presented at 5, 6, and 7 p.m.</p>
<p>The Lewistown Field Office will be amending the Judith Valley Phillips Resource Management Plan to apply greater sage-grouse habitat conservation measures to land use activities.</p>
<p>Based on ongoing threats to the greater sage-grouse and its habitat throughout the West, as well as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service&#8217;s 2015 deadline for making a decision whether to list the species under the Endangered Species Act, the BLM will be incorporating consistent objectives and conservation measures into relevant resource management plans by September 2014.</p>
<p>For those unable to attend the scoping meeting, scoping comments may be submitted by a variety of methods. More information on how to submit comments can be found at <a href="http://www.blm.gov/mt/st/en/prog/wildlife/mtdksplanning.html" target="_blank">http://www.blm.gov/mt/st/en/prog/wildlife/mtdksplanning.html</a>.</p>
<p>The scoping period began December 9 and ends February 7, 2012.</p>
<p>For more information on the scoping process and greater sage-grouse habitat conservation measures, visit the BLM&#8217;s greater sage-grouse website at <a rel="nofollow">http://www.blm.gov/sagegrouse</a>.</p>
<p>Contacts: Craig Flentie, 406-538-1943</p>
<p>or Mary Apple, 406-896-5258</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/sage-grouse-meetings-attend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

