<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Citizens for Balanced Use &#187; Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://balanceduse.org/news/legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://balanceduse.org</link>
	<description>Support responsible shared use of YOUR public lands!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 18:18:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Baucus Reintroduces Conservation Managment Area/Wilderness Bill</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/baucus-reintroduces-conservation-managment-areawilderness-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/baucus-reintroduces-conservation-managment-areawilderness-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 04:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CBU News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CBU Note: The Montana House of Representatives Natural Resources Sub-Committee recently tabled House Resolution HJ 8, which opposed Sen. Tester’s Forest Jobs and Recreation Act. It was our opinion then, that there would be little to stop the FJRA and that Sen. Baucus would resurrect his Rocky Mountain Front bill. It did not take long [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><em>CBU Note: The Montana House of Representatives Natural Resources Sub-Committee recently tabled House Resolution HJ 8, which opposed Sen. Tester’s Forest Jobs and Recreation Act. It was our opinion then, that there would be little to stop the FJRA and that Sen. Baucus would resurrect his Rocky Mountain Front bill. It did not take long for Sen. Baucus to capitalize.</em></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div id="adcontainer___gelement_adbanner_0_0">
<div id="__gelement_221">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="ody-mainphoto">
<div>
<div><img class="aligncenter" src="http://cmsimg.greatfallstribune.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?Site=G1&amp;Date=20130220&amp;Category=NEWS01&amp;ArtNo=302200017&amp;Ref=AR&amp;MaxW=640&amp;Border=0&amp;Baucus-reintroduces-bill-protect-Front" alt="The plains meet the mountains on the Rocky Mountain Front near Augusta, shown here on Oct. 26, 2011, with Sawtooth Ridge at fthe ar right. Sen. Max Baucus has reintroduced the Rocky Mountain Front Heritage Act. TRIBUNE PHOTO/RION SANDERS" /></p>
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The plains meet the mountains on the Rocky Mountain Front near Augusta, shown here on Oct. 26, 2011, with Sawtooth Ridge at fthe ar right. Sen. Max Baucus has reintroduced the Rocky Mountain Front Heritage Act. TRIBUNE PHOTO/RION SANDERS.</p>
</div>
<p>U.S. Sen. Max Baucus of Montana is taking another run at getting a bill passed in Congress that would increase protections for 275,272 acres of public land on the Rocky Mountain Front west of Great Falls.</p>
<p>The announcement, which came Wednesday, was timed with the 100-year anniversary of the state Legislature’s creation of the Front’s Sun River Game Preserve, Montana’s first game preserve. Today, the reserve, located in the Bob Marshall Wilderness adjacent to the Rocky Mountain Front, is managed by the U.S. Forest Service.</p>
<p>The bill creating the Sun River preserve, passed in 1913, was crafted at the grass-roots level, just like the Heritage Act, Baucus, a Democrat, said.</p>
<p>“We owe it to our kids and grandkids to protect unique treasures like the Front that make Montana the greatest place on Earth,” Baucus said in a statement. “On top of that, protecting the Front is good for business and good for Montana jobs, with more than $10 million spent each year in the Front during hunting season alone.”</p>
<p>The legislation would designate 208,160 acres as Conservation Management Area, which Baucus refers to as a “home-grown designation” limiting road building but protecting current motorized recreation and public access for hunting, biking, forest thinning and grazing.</p>
<p>Supporters of the new CMA designation say it’s necessary because the current status of the land, while largely protected now, could be changed in future forest management plans. They say the bill addresses the threat of future expansion in motorized uses.</p>
<p>The legislation also would add 67,112 acres of new wilderness to the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex</p>
<p>“It’s not an earth-changing piece of legislation,” said Dusty Crary, a Choteau-area rancher who testified in favor of the Heritage Act when it was heard in the Senate Subcommittee on Public Lands and Forest last March. “It says, ‘We like the Front the way it is,’ and unless you put it in writing there’s no guarantee it will stay that way.”</p>
<p>Crary, who is in Washington, D.C., on other legislative business, said all the talk in D.C. is focusing on the financial issues facing the country, but he’s still raising the bill when he speaks to staff members of lawmakers, who are in recess.</p>
<p>“It’s not that controversial of a bill,” Crary said of the Heritage Act. “It doesn’t have a fiscal note to it. It’s not a really hairy bill as far as some things, and I hope they get to it.”</p>
<p>Baucus first introduced the Rocky Mountain Front Heritage Act in 2011. Most of the land is in Lewis and Clark National Forest but some is managed by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management.</p>
<p>It needed reintroduction because the 212th Congress, which adjourned Jan. 3, didn’t vote on it.</p>
<p>Baucus plans to try for another hearing in the Energy and Natural Resources Committee and a vote to clear the panel. In past years, various land bills have been combined into one public land bill.</p>
<p>There are a couple of changes in Heritage Act that the 213th Congress will consider.</p>
<p>Baucus said he worked with ranchers from Augusta to strengthen protections for responsible grazing practices within the lands designated as Conservation Management Area. The new bill also ensures that the Benchmark airstrip within the CM will remain open.</p>
<p>In reintroducing the legislation, Baucus cited a recent study by the Outdoor Industry Association that found that outdoor recreation supports 64,000 Montana jobs and results in $5.8 billion in consumer spending, $1.5 billion in wages and salaries in addition to $403 million in state and local tax revenue.</p>
<p>The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks estimates that there were 90,000 hunter days on the Rocky Mountain Front in 2010, the senator said. Sportsmen spent $10 million annually from 2006 through 2010 during hunting season on the Front, he said.</p>
<p>Montana Sen. Jon Tester, a Democrat, is co-sponsoring the bill.</p>
<p>Baucus also wrote a provision that passed in 2006 that permanently protects the Rocky Mountain Front from oil and gas development. In January 2011, he worked to secure a voluntary agreement from five energy companies to relinquish oil and gas leases on nearly 29,000 acres of Montana’s Rocky Mountain Front adjacent to Glacier National Park.</p>
<p>Baucus said the Heritage Act will not affect oil and gas development on private or state land.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.greatfallstribune.com/article/20130220/NEWS01/302200017/Baucus-reintroduces-bill-protect-Front?nclick_check=1">http://www.greatfallstribune.com/article/20130220/NEWS01/302200017/Baucus-reintroduces-bill-protect-Front?nclick_check=1</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/baucus-reintroduces-conservation-managment-areawilderness-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBU alert: Federal Land Grab</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/cbu-alert-federal-land-grab/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/cbu-alert-federal-land-grab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 22:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citizens for Balanced Use Federal Land Grab Alert     &#160; The environmental groups have an inside track with the current President and the agencies under his control. Leaked emails from Interior Ken Salazar exposed secret meetings and the agenda to designate 2.5 million acres of Montana as the Treasured Landscape National Monument. This administration [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table id="yui_3_2_0_1_1332218737824810" width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="center" bgcolor="#ffffcc" width="100%">
<table id="yiv1670504085content_LETTER.BLOCK2" width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="middle"><strong>Citizens for Balanced Use</strong><br />
<strong>Federal Land Grab Alert<br />
</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#3e506d" width="100%" height="20"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e2e1e1" width="100%">
<table id="yiv1670504085content_LETTER.BLOCK4" width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<div><strong></strong> </div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The environmental groups have an inside track with the current President and the agencies under his control. Leaked emails from Interior Ken Salazar exposed secret meetings and the agenda to designate 2.5 million acres of Montana as the Treasured Landscape National Monument. This administration is committed to lock away and put off limits the vital resources that fuel our nation and provide for our national security.&nbsp;<br />
Last year, the Obama administration released their &#8220;America&#8217;s Great Outdoors Initiative (AGOI) in Ovando, MT. I attended this meeting and found the attendees were the who&#8217;s who of environmental groups along with the Secretary of Agriculture, the Chairman of the President&#8217;s Council on Environmental Quality, Senator Baucus, Senator Tester, Governor Schweitzer and a representative from Secretary Salazar&#8217;s office. The meeting was required to be public but information was withheld from the public until the last minute and released just 2 days before the Memorial Day weekend. The meeting was held in Ovando, several hundred miles from the area targeted in the AGOI.</p>
<p>The meeting took place on the ranch of Jim Stone, a so-called rancher and new found partner of the environmental groups through the project known as the Blackfoot Challenge. Mr. Stone collected thousands of dollars in conservation money for his support of the Blackfoot Challenge and was now helping the environmental groups expand their property control to areas of the entire Rocky Mountain Front, conveniently renamed at this Ovando meeting as the Crown of the Continent.</p>
<p>Interestingly enough at the Ovando meeting I found the maps that were displayed did not show a single acres of private property. They showed Federal land, National Parks and one color for both &#8220;state and other land&#8221;. This is a clear indication these groups do not recognize private property.</p>
<p>One of the partners for this federal land grab is Greg Neudecker, a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service staff member. He is also the vice chairman of the Blackfoot Challenge. When government agency personnel are also holding executive offices with environmental organization project teams, people should be concerned. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has been involved in numerous actions to destroy agriculture and ranching with their support of wolves, taking of water rights, stream setbacks, wetland designation, and the list goes on and on.</p>
<p>The attacks on private property rights and access to our resources and recreation will escalate during the next year. We must be vigilant in working together to stop these actions. Please read more information on this below in an article from the Missoulian dated March 7, 2012 by Rob Chaney.</p>
<p>Notice in the article that Neudecker, the staff member of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services, is quoted as saying, &#8220;<strong>the money wasn&#8217;t coming from taxpayer dollars.&#8221; </strong>Granted, this money comes from royalties from off shore drilling, but really isn&#8217;t this money coming from the general treasury and should be considered tax payer dollars. If this money were not to be spent on the government buying more land and attacking private property rights, couldn&#8217;t it be used to pay down a portion of our nearly 16 trillion dollar debt?<br />
&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table id="yiv1670504085content_LETTER.BLOCK5" width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#3e506d">Missoulian Article by Rob Chaney </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Obama proposes $29M in Montana land conservation projects</p>
<ul>
<li> </li>
</ul>
<p><a rel="nofollow">By ROB CHANEY of the Missoulian </a>| Posted: Wednesday, March 7, 2012 9:30 pm | <a rel="nofollow">No Comments Posted</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> Montana acreage ranks high on President Barack Obama&#8217;s wish list for 2013 landscape conservation initiatives, including possible additions to Glacier National Park, conservation easements in the Blackfoot Valley and the Rocky Mountain Front, and completion of the Montana Legacy Project.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&#8220;The fact this has risen to this level, with a White House conference last week, is really important,&#8221; said Greg Neudecker, a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service staff member and vice chairman of the Blackfoot Challenge. &#8220;The president and secretary of Interior were very complimentary of what folks in the Crown of the Continent have been doing here. It&#8217;s great to see them latching on to community conservation.&#8221;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Ovando rancher Jim Stone visited with Obama and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar last Friday at the White House Conservation Conference in Washington, D.C. The meeting grew out of the president&#8217;s new America&#8217;s Great Outdoors Initiative, which kicked off last year in Ovando before going nationwide.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s one of the things we&#8217;ve been missing for a lot of years here is the ability to interact with the administration,&#8221; Stone said. &#8220;That was one of our initial requests &#8211; if you want to talk large landscapes, we need to be able to touch base with folks inside the administration. Now I think these guys are listening to folks out on the ground.&#8221;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Obama released his proposal for 2013 land acquisitions through the Land and Water Conservation Fund, which uses federal royalties from offshore oil and gas production to improve public lands. Montana features in National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service and Forest Service budgets to a total of roughly $29 million.</p>
<p>Conservation easements to keep farms and ranches from subdivision in the Blackfoot, Swan and Rocky Mountain Front would receive $19.7 million in 2013. More than 30,000 acres of private land would be kept in agricultural production through the easements, which also benefit wildlife habitat.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The National Park Service requested $3.3 million to acquire 318 acres of inholdings along the Middle and North Forks of the Flathead River. One of those is the 120-acre Doody Homestead along the Middle Fork, the colorfully historic home of an early park ranger and his moonshiner wife.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Glacier spokeswoman Denise Germann said the park has long been trying to acquire private inholdings whenever willing sellers appear. But having the support from community groups throughout the Crown of the Continent makes the process much easier.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re pleased to see that now and the value that&#8217;s put on conservation of lands,&#8221; Germann said of the president&#8217;s budget proposal. &#8220;I would anticipate that may change before it&#8217;s a final budget. Congress has to agree to all this.&#8221;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The National Parks Conservation Association was one of those groups advocating for the Doody acquisition. Spokesman Michael Jamison said the long-term commitment was essential to building credibility for the project.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you love Glacier Park, then you have to be excited about this investment,&#8221; Jamison said. &#8220;Purchasing these important inholdings has been a top priority for the Park Service for a long time, and with the help of community leaders and friends-of-the-park groups, the funding is finally being made available. It really does represent a step toward completing the work that was started 100 years ago, when Glacier was first established.&#8221;</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Montana&#8217;s congressional delegation offered mixed reviews of the proposed spending. Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., said he supported raising the Land and Water Conservation Fund budget to its allowed $322 million and approved of the Montana projects.</p>
<p>&#8220;Access to public lands is a top priority for Montana&#8217;s hunters and anglers,&#8221; Tester said in an email. &#8220;The Land and Water Conservation Fund is a popular, smart investment because it provides Montana&#8217;s sportsmen and women with access to good hunting and fishing opportunities.&#8221;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Rep. Denny Rehberg, R-Mont., said he was still looking over the president&#8217;s wish list.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;ve got more government than we can afford,&#8221; Rehberg said in an email. &#8220;And that means we&#8217;ve got to set priorities, and learn to say &#8216;no&#8217; so we can say &#8216;yes&#8217; to the things that Montanans care about most.&#8221;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Some of those priorities already have received funding, although they have several years left to complete. For example, the Montana Legacy Project transferred 310,000 acres of Plum Creek Timber Co. land into public and conservation hands in three phases. The president&#8217;s budget calls for $14.8 million to complete another portion of that deal in the Swan Valley.</p>
<p>&#8220;Those parcels in the Swan are higher value than some of the other timber lands,&#8221; said Lolo National Forest lands program manager Jennifer Watson. &#8220;We&#8217;ve been bringing them all together as we get funding.&#8221;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A Blackfoot River special resource management area along the river corridor would get up to $5.5 million for new public land. At the Blackfoot Challenge,<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Neudecker stressed the money wasn&#8217;t coming from taxpayer dollars, but would still help local communities.</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s an extremely ambitious proposal,&#8221; Neudecker said. &#8220;I think if we&#8217;re going to be successful, we have to target resources toward the best landscapes. This is stuff we&#8217;ve collectively been working on. Landowners are supportive we just want to see it maintained. But it&#8217;s got a ways to go.&#8221;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/cbu-alert-federal-land-grab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USFWS looking to take more Montana water rights</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/usfws-montana-water-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/usfws-montana-water-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 22:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://dnrc.mt.gov/rwrcc/Compacts/CharlesMRussell/Default.asp Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge The Compact Commission has received a preliminary compact proposal from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge. The USFWS is currently working to generate a revised proposal for the CMR. The revised proposal and any associated documents will be posted on this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div>
<h4><a href="http://dnrc.mt.gov/rwrcc/Compacts/CharlesMRussell/Default.asp">http://dnrc.mt.gov/rwrcc/Compacts/CharlesMRussell/Default.asp</a></h4>
<h2>Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge</h2>
<p>The Compact Commission has received a preliminary compact proposal from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge. The USFWS is currently working to generate a revised proposal for the CMR. The revised proposal and any associated documents will be posted on this site, along with information regarding upcoming public meetings and negotiation sessions, in the near future.</p>
<p>If you have questions regarding the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge Compact or the negotiation process, please <a href="mailto:dnrrwrcc@mt.gov">email us</a>. If you would like to be added to the mailing list to receive emails regarding negotiation sessions, public outreach, or related events, please send an <a href="mailto:dnrrwrcc@mt.gov">email</a> with “CMR mailing list” in the subject line. If you prefer to receive communications through U.S. Mail, please indicate as much in the text of your message.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dnrc.mt.gov/rwrcc/Compacts/CharlesMRussell/CMRProposal.pdf">USFWS CMR Proposal Letter</a>(pdf)</li>
<li><a href="http://dnrc.mt.gov/rwrcc/Compacts/CharlesMRussell/CMRProposedCompactArea.pdf">CMR Proposed Compact Area</a> (pdf</li>
</ul>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/usfws-montana-water-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trout Unlimited looks to steal water rights from users</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/trout-unlimited-steal-water-rights-users/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/trout-unlimited-steal-water-rights-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[High court lets Trout Unlimited in on water claims CBU opinion: This sets a precedence of TU coming in and filing a lawsuit on well water rights of your home, farm, ranch and city water usage be it from rivers or wells. This gives TU another way to abuse the Equal Access to Justice Act and taking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div>
<h3>High court lets Trout Unlimited in on water claims</h3>
<p><em>CBU opinion: This sets a precedence of TU coming in and filing a lawsuit on well water rights of your home, farm, ranch and city water usage be it from rivers or wells. This gives TU another way to abuse the Equal Access to Justice Act and taking more money from the taxpayers through frivolous lawsuits.</em></div>
<div>
<p>The Montana Supreme Court says Trout Unlimited can dispute water rights claims even though it doesn&#8217;t have a claim to the water itself.</p>
<p>The ruling overturns a Montana Water Court decision which had only allowed objections in ongoing cases by those with a water right elsewhere in a basin.</p>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/article_8061ef02-9df2-11e0-bf2b-001cc4c002e0.html#ixzz1QCTLNs4a">http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/article_8061ef02-9df2-11e0-bf2b-001cc4c002e0.html#ixzz1QCTLNs4a</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/trout-unlimited-steal-water-rights-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News from ARRA in Washington DC on OHV recreation hearing</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/news-arra-washington-dc-ohv-recreation-hearing/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/news-arra-washington-dc-ohv-recreation-hearing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  ARRA Partners Promote OHV Recreation to House Subcommittee Yesterday, June 22nd the House Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands held a hearing titled “Opportunities for Outdoor Recreation on Public Lands.” The focus of the hearing was on access to federal lands for recreational use and the economic benefits of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong></strong> </p>
<p><strong>ARRA Partners Promote OHV Recreation to House Subcommittee</strong></p>
<p>Yesterday, June 22<sup>nd</sup> the House Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands held a hearing titled “<em>Opportunities for Outdoor Recreation on Public Lands.”</em> The focus of the hearing was on access to federal lands for recreational use and the economic benefits of recreational activity on federal lands.</p>
<p>OHV leaders from several ARRA partners testified about the economic benefit of motorized recreation, while others focused on specific access issues. Testimony was provided on H.R. 1581, which would release all Wilderness Study Areas and Inventoried Roadless Areas that have been deemed not suitable for wilderness designation for management for multiple-use, and on the closure of the Clear Creek Management Area in California.  A full witness list and the written testimony for each witness can be read <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arra-access.com/site/R?i=GlGUpM3RG6qzVGWHAwoJxw.." target="_blank">here</a>.  An archived webcast of the hearing can be viewed <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arra-access.com/site/R?i=o1n87ftgs26ij9YqqCP7OA.." target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>ARRA would like to thank Chairman Rob Bishop (R-UT) and the Subcommittee for holding this important hearing, which showcased many of the positive benefits of OHV recreation on public lands, particularly the positive economic impact that motorized recreation can have on neighboring communities.  Dick Lepley, who testified on behalf of the Pennsylvania Off-Highway Vehicle Association, summed up one of the major themes of the hearing when he said, “If I could deliver just one message today it would be that OHV opportunities equal jobs. Where trail systems exist, the powersports industry and dealerships thrive, and local communities flourish.”</p>
<div>Americans for Responsible Recreation Access</div>
<div>1152 15th Street, NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20005<br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:webmaster@arra-access.com" target="_blank">webmaster@arra-access.com</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/news-arra-washington-dc-ohv-recreation-hearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enviro groups look to increase EPA&#8217;s power</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/enviro-groups-increase-epas-power/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/enviro-groups-increase-epas-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 04:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outdoors groups urge Congress to defend Clean Air Act CBU opinion: The story below talks about mercury contamination in our waters, and how the high water runoff will pull mercury off the land scape into the water ways. The only part the do not mention is the high amounts of mercury emissions released during uncontrolled&#8221; let it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><h3>Outdoors groups urge Congress to defend Clean Air Act</h3>
<p><em>CBU opinion: The story below talks about mercury contamination in our waters, and how the high water runoff will pull mercury off the land scape into the water ways. The only part the do not mention is the high amounts of mercury emissions released during uncontrolled&#8221; let it burn policy&#8221; forest fires that release tremendous amounts of mercury emissions into our environment that far exceed any emissions released from all of the industry combined.   </em></p>
<p><em> About 330 sporting, hunting and angling organizations, including 30 </em>from Montana, have sent a letter to Congress urging its members to oppose any effort to weaken the Clean Air Act.</p>
<p>In the letter, the groups note that the Environmental Protection Agency is poised to cut pollution that causes toxic mercury contamination and set standards to limit carbon emissions.</p>
<p>The federal agency is taking public comments on proposed amendments to the act and expects to issue them by next year.</p>
<p>To read the full story<a href="http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/article_a8f5192a-7a92-55c0-a378-640802abc868.html" target="_blank"> click here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/enviro-groups-increase-epas-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schweitzer and feds at odds over land management</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/schweitzer-feds-odds-land-management/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/schweitzer-feds-odds-land-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 04:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Schweitzer tells land managers issues remain CBU opinion: The Gov. and the feds have been at odds for years against the majority of Montana&#8217;s wishes of how public lands are managed. The AGO was shelved for the moment due to the large opposition recognizing this was a land grab of public and private lands access and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><h3>Schweitzer tells land managers issues remain</h3>
<p><em>CBU opinion: The Gov. and the feds have been at odds for years against the majority of Montana&#8217;s wishes of how public lands are managed. The AGO was shelved for the moment due to the large opposition recognizing this was a land grab of public and private lands access and rights.  The issues mentioned in this story are all threats to Montana&#8217;s historic heritage, and present day viable economic base.    </em></p>
<p>Gov. Brian Schweitzer on Monday told federal land managers looking for ways to work with Montana on the Obama administration&#8217;s land conservation plan that he was interested but skeptical given the state&#8217;s lingering problems with the federal government.</p>
<p>The governor met with administration officials from several agencies who were pitching the &#8220;America&#8217;s Great Outdoors&#8221; initiative, more than a year in the works and the product of public meetings around the country.</p>
<p>To read the full story<a href="http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/article_91378eba-9b8e-11e0-ac59-001cc4c002e0.html" target="_blank"> click here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/schweitzer-feds-odds-land-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opportunities for Outdoor Recreation on Public Lands hearing being held in D.C.</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/opportunities-outdoor-recreation-public-lands-hearing-held-dc/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/opportunities-outdoor-recreation-public-lands-hearing-held-dc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On June 22nd the House Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands will hold a hearing titled “Opportunities for Outdoor Recreation on Public Lands.” While the final witness list has yet to be released we anticipate that motorized recreation will be represented on the panels.  The Hearing, which will be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arra-access.com/site/R?i=RFF0MmFfztLGJZpYAhlwWA.." target="_blank"><img src="http://www.arra-access.com/images/content/pagebuilder/11069.jpg" border="0" alt="Americans for Responsible Recreational Access" width="755" height="110" /></a></p>
<p>On June 22<sup>nd</sup> the House Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands will hold a hearing titled “<em>Opportunities for Outdoor Recreation on Public Lands.”</em> While the final witness list has yet to be released we anticipate that motorized recreation will be represented on the panels. </p>
<p>The Hearing, which will be held in Washington D.C. in 1324 Longworth House Office Building, will be webcast starting at 10:00 AM on Wednesday, June 22<sup>nd</sup> on the Committee’s website here:</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arra-access.com/site/R?i=O6eNtH8xANpAP43ckBnJEw.." target="_blank">http://naturalresources.house.gov/Live/</a></p>
<p>ARRA is excited that this hearing will provide a valuable opportunity for the Subcommittee to hear about the value of outdoor recreation and about some of the threats to access.</p>
<p>Stay tuned for additional alerts to keep you up to date on details as they become available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/opportunities-outdoor-recreation-public-lands-hearing-held-dc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enviro&#8217;s denied power to harm Montana economy and recreation</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/enviros-denied-power-harm-mont-economy-recreation/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/enviros-denied-power-harm-mont-economy-recreation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Montana Supreme Court denies climate petition The Montana Supreme Court on Wednesday denied a petition filed by attorneys seeking state regulations to curb greenhouse gas emissions. Siding with Attorney General Steve Bullock, justices wrote in their order that the case raised too many questions about Montana&#8217;s contribution to a global problem To read the full [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><h3>Montana Supreme Court denies climate petition</h3>
<p>The Montana Supreme Court on Wednesday denied a petition filed by attorneys seeking state regulations to curb greenhouse gas emissions.</p>
<p>Siding with Attorney General Steve Bullock, justices wrote in their order that the case raised too many questions about Montana&#8217;s contribution to a global problem</p>
<p>To read the full story click here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/enviros-denied-power-harm-mont-economy-recreation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wild Lands policy not over yet</title>
		<link>http://balanceduse.org/news/wild-lands-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://balanceduse.org/news/wild-lands-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 03:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StacyBragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balanceduse.org/?p=2405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Utah, Alaska and Wyoming to pursue wild lands lawsuit Utah officials said Tuesday they will continue to pursue a lawsuit against the federal government over a public lands policy the U.S. Interior Department withdrew last week. Also Tuesday, the governors in Alaska and Wyoming said they won&#8217;t withdraw a request to join the lawsuit until [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><h3>Utah, Alaska and Wyoming to pursue wild lands lawsuit</h3>
<p>Utah officials said Tuesday they will continue to pursue a lawsuit against the federal government over a public lands policy the U.S. Interior Department withdrew last week.</p>
<p>Also Tuesday, the governors in Alaska and Wyoming said they won&#8217;t withdraw a request to join the lawsuit until the policy is formally rescinded by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.</p>
<p><a href="http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/wyoming/article_d9e44e44-915e-11e0-9a1f-001cc4c002e0.html">Click here to read the full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://balanceduse.org/news/wild-lands-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
